The Weekly Echo (17/06/25)

The Weekly Echo (17/06/25)

Welcome back to The Weekly Echo!

We’re officially halfway through June, and it’s already shaping up to be a critical month for geopolitics, global trade, and economic policy. This week, all eyes turned to the Middle East, where renewed conflict between Iran and Israel sent shockwaves through oil markets and reignited fears of global supply chain disruption.

Meanwhile, world leaders gathered in Alberta for the G7 Summit, grappling with issues such as trade fragmentation, energy security, and climate change goals. And closer to home, the UK government is reportedly walking back parts of its non-dom tax reform, following pushback from high-net-worth individuals and City stakeholders.

In this week’s edition, we break down what all of this means - from oil prices and inflation risks to political credibility and investor sentiment.

Let’s dive in.

1. Middle East Tensions Return: Oil Prices Surge After Israel–Iran Escalation

Oil markets were jolted this week as Israeli airstrikes targeted critical military, nuclear, and energy infrastructure in Iran, escalating tensions across the Middle East and reigniting fears of broader regional conflict. Brent crude surged over 7% in a single day, its sharpest jump in three years, peaking near $78 per barrel before easing to $74 as markets absorbed the news.

The escalation marks the most significant flare-up between the two nations since 2021 and has reintroduced a geopolitical risk premium into global energy prices.

Why Did Oil Prices Spike?

1. Strait of Hormuz in the Crosshairs
   Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow but vital shipping lane through which nearly 20% of the world’s seaborne oil flows. Even the possibility of restricted passage is enough to send prices climbing.
   
   The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important oil chokepoints. Disruption here affects global supply and can rapidly inflate crude prices.
   
   

2. Energy Infrastructure Under Threat
   Iranian state media confirmed disruptions at South Pars, the world’s largest offshore gas field, following precautionary shutdowns. Attacks on key facilities have raised alarm over potential broader supply impacts, especially if retaliation or cyberattacks follow.
   

3. The Return of the Risk Premium
   Markets are now pricing in an additional $5–$10 per barrel “risk premium” to account for the uncertainty and likelihood of further escalation.
   
   A risk premium refers to the extra cost embedded into prices to reflect geopolitical or economic uncertainty. In oil markets, it’s essentially insurance against future supply disruptions.

What This Means for the Global Economy

1. Upward Pressure on Energy Costs
   Rising oil prices ripple through supply chains. Fuel-intensive sectors, such as shipping, logistics, airlines, and plastics, face higher input costs, which can be passed on to consumers.
   

2. Inflation Risk Returns
   With many central banks still battling to bring inflation under control, higher oil prices could complicate monetary policy decisions, particularly in the U.S., where the Fed was expected to begin cutting rates this summer.
   
   Oil is a major input cost in modern economies. When energy prices rise, they increase costs for businesses and consumers alike, potentially reigniting inflation.
   
   

3. Stagflation Concerns Resurface
   If growth slows while prices rise, economists warn of a stagflation scenario, in which central banks struggle to stimulate demand without exacerbating inflation.
   
   Stagflation is a rare but damaging condition where inflation is high, but economic growth is weak or stagnant. It limits policy options and can erode real wages.

What Happens Next?

• Volatility Likely to Persist:
  Oil prices have fluctuated as much as ±4% intraday this week. Traders are watching closely for Iranian retaliation or broader regional involvement.
  

• Shipping Reroutes Are Underway:
  Tanker firms are already adjusting their routes to avoid conflict zones in the Gulf, which is raising shipping costs and delaying the delivery of energy, commodities, and manufactured goods.
  

• Central Banks on Alert:
  The Federal Reserve and other central banks may adjust their rate cut expectations if elevated oil prices persist, which could alter the outlook for equity, bond, and currency markets.

Final Thought

This latest Middle East flashpoint comes at a delicate time for the global economy. With supply chains still recovering from past shocks and inflation proving stubborn, the return of geopolitical instability in energy markets could not be more poorly timed.

Whether this surge in oil prices is temporary or the start of a longer trend will depend on how both Iran and Israel respond—and whether global diplomacy can cool the region before it spills further into markets and households alike.

2. UK Rethinks Non-Dom Tax Changes as Wealthy Residents Exit

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is weighing a U-turn on her April overhaul of non-domicile (“non-dom”) tax rules, amid rising pressure from financial leaders, business groups, and early evidence of capital flight. At the centre of the controversy is a new rule subjecting long-term UK residents to a 40% inheritance tax on offshore assets. This change was initially hailed as a fairness measure but is now facing growing scrutiny.

The move comes as new data reveals that more than 4,400 UK company directors, many with high net worth, have formally changed their tax residency since the reform was announced. Several billionaires are reportedly exploring relocation options, triggering concern within the City of London.

What Are Non-Dom Tax Rules?

A non-domiciled individual, or non-dom, is someone who resides in the UK but whose permanent home (domicile) is outside the UK. Historically, non-doms could legally shield overseas income and assets from UK tax, making Britain a magnet for international wealth.

The April 2025 reform proposed two major changes:

1. Scrapping the remittance basis (which allowed tax exemption on offshore income kept abroad) after four years of UK residency.
   

2. Introducing a 40% inheritance tax on worldwide assets, including offshore wealth, after 10 years of residency.
   

Inheritance tax (IHT) is a levy on the estate (property, money, and possessions) of someone who has died. In the UK, the standard rate is 40% above a tax-free threshold; however, this previously applied mainly to UK-based assets for non-domiciled individuals.

Why Is the Government Reconsidering?

1. Capital Flight and HNWI Exodus
   Private client law firms and financial advisers report a sharp uptick in relocation inquiries from ultra-wealthy individuals. Jurisdictions like Dubai, Monaco, and Singapore are reportedly gaining new residents from Britain’s top tax bracket.
   
   High-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) contribute disproportionately to income tax, property purchases, and investment capital. Their departure can shrink the tax base more than it raises revenue.
   

2. Impact on UK’s Global Financial Hub Status
   Executives in the City of London have warned that the changes are damaging the UK’s competitiveness. London has long relied on its appeal to global capital and talent, supported by tax certainty and investor-friendly rules.
   
   Reeves’ team is reportedly exploring carve-outs or modifications to the inheritance rule, especially for trusts and wealth earned prior to UK residency.
   

What Are the Arguments on Both Sides?

Supporters of the original reform argue that non-doms have enjoyed preferential treatment for too long, and equalising tax rules is both morally fair and fiscally necessary. The Treasury initially projected billions in new revenue over the next decade.

But critics point to economic trade-offs:

• Short-term revenue may be outweighed by long-term losses if wealthy individuals leave.
  

• London risks falling behind other financial hubs offering more favourable tax regimes.
  

• Mid-tier entrepreneurs and expats, rather than just billionaires, may be discouraged from settling or investing in the UK.
  

The Broader Context

This debate mirrors wider tensions in UK fiscal policy:

• Balancing fairness with competitiveness: Labour is keen to prove it can fund public services without stifling private enterprise.
  

• Rebuilding investor confidence: With the UK still facing weak productivity and muted growth, retaining capital inflows is critical.
  

Competitiveness, in this context, refers to a country's ability to attract investment, businesses, and skilled workers through favourable economic conditions, including tax policies, regulations, and infrastructure.

Final Thought

Reeves’ apparent backtrack signals a government walking a fine line, seeking fairness in taxation without driving away the very individuals who contribute significantly to the economy. Whether this results in a full reversal, partial exemption, or technical adjustments, the episode highlights a broader challenge: how to tax global wealth in a manner that’s both politically defensible and economically sustainable.

The coming weeks will show whether Labour can deliver a reform that preserves equity, without hollowing out the City.

3. G7 Summit in Canada Tests Western Unity on Trade, Climate, and Conflict

The 51st G7 Summit took place this week in Kananaskis, Alberta, against a backdrop of rising global instability. Leaders from the world’s top advanced economies, including the U.S., the UK, the EU, Japan, and Canada, met to discuss a comprehensive agenda that spanned trade fragmentation, energy security, climate change, and the growing geopolitical fallout from the Middle East.

This year’s gathering came at a critical moment for global governance, as disagreements within the group threaten to undermine the very multilateral cooperation the G7 was designed to uphold.

What Was on the Table?

1. Trade Tensions in Focus

A major point of contention was U.S. President Trump’s continued pressure for bilateral trade deals over multilateral ones. He has hinted at more aggressive tariffs, even on allies, and pushed for policies that prioritise domestic manufacturing.

But other G7 members, led by Canada and the EU, countered with a call for coordination, arguing that supply chain fragmentation would hurt all economies. They reaffirmed support for rules-based trade and WTO reforms, rather than escalation.

Multilateralism refers to cooperative approaches among multiple countries. In trade, it promotes standardised rules and dispute systems. Bilateralism, by contrast, relies on country-to-country deals, often favouring the more powerful party.

2. Climate Commitments Lagging

Progress on climate change remains inconsistent. While all G7 countries have pledged net-zero emissions targets, recent reports indicate that they are falling behind in renewable energy deployment and reducing fossil fuel subsidies.

This summit saw renewed calls, particularly from France and Germany, for binding green investment frameworks, but concrete action remains limited. Investors are seeking tangible policy signals before scaling up commitments to green technology and decarbonisation.

Net-zero refers to balancing the amount of greenhouse gas emitted with the amount removed from the atmosphere, usually by 2050. It serves as a key benchmark in climate policy.

3. Middle East Escalation Adds Tension

The recent Israel–Iran conflict, including airstrikes on Iranian infrastructure, added urgency to energy security discussions. Leaders acknowledged the risk to oil transit through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic chokepoint handling 20% of global oil.

The G7 issued a joint statement backing diplomacy and de-escalation, conscious that further conflict could destabilise markets and raise global inflation through higher energy prices.

Why This Summit Matters

Western Unity Under Strain

The G7 has long been a symbol of economic alignment among the world's leading democratic powers. But the summit revealed growing divisions:

• The U.S. push for protectionism risks undermining collective responses to global shocks.
  

• Europe and Japan remain committed to multilateral institutions and green agendas, but lack U.S. backing on some fronts.
  

• Canada, as host, sought to broker consensus, particularly on supply chain resilience and AI regulation, but found limited traction.
  

Market Implications

The G7’s ability (or failure) to present a united front affects markets in several ways:

• Energy prices: A lack of coordination on oil policy or Middle East diplomacy could lead to increased volatility.
  

• Inflation pathways: Trade fragmentation and climate inaction can sustain inflationary pressures via supply bottlenecks.
  

• Investment sentiment: Policy clarity from the G7 influences cross-border capital flows into infrastructure, tech, and clean energy.
  

Final Thought

The G7 summit showcased both the necessity and fragility of global economic cooperation. While shared language on diplomacy and climate was evident, real alignment remains elusive, particularly with the U.S. election looming. For now, markets are watching closely to see whether this summit yields follow-through or fades into another round of geopolitical uncertainty.

As global shocks mount, the ability of the G7 to collaborate will be tested like never before.

As always, thanks for reading The Weekly Echo, and welcome to the second half of 2025. If the past few months are anything to go by, the global economy isn’t slowing down anytime soon.

From oil market tremors and tax policy U-turns to tense diplomacy at the G7, this week has been packed with developments that could reshape the second half of the year.

We’d love to hear your thoughts. Hit reply if you’ve got feedback, ideas, or a story you think we should cover.

And if you’ve found this edition helpful, insightful, or just a good read, please share it with a friend, colleague, or fellow econ nerd.

Catch up on past editions here:

See you next week,
Harry & Reika
Co-Founders, Echonomics

Catch up on previous editions here: