Politics shift, policies pivot, and markets look for clarity

Welcome back to The Weekly Echo. Can you believe we’re already halfway through 2025? With summer approaching and Q2 nearly behind us, the global economy is sending out a mix of cautious signals and political surprises.

In London, U.S. and Chinese officials have returned to the negotiating table in a fresh attempt to stabilise trade relations, and with them, the broader global supply chain. It’s the most serious round of talks in over a year, and markets are watching closely.

Back in the UK, Labour is already reversing course on key budget measures. The reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Payment marks a clear political U-turn, likely driven by recent local election losses and rising pressure to support older voters. Meanwhile, the transatlantic interest rate divide is widening once again, as Trump piles pressure on the Fed, setting up a clash between central bank independence and campaign politics.

And with the UK’s new Budget now in focus, the economic landscape for the second half of the year is already starting to take shape. Let’s get into it.

1. U.S. and China Meet in London for High-Stakes Trade Talks

Senior U.S. and Chinese officials met in London this week for the most significant round of trade talks since early 2024. The meetings, held at Lancaster House, mark a crucial moment in efforts to stabilise global economic relations between the world’s two largest economies, and could determine the fate of the fragile 90-day tariff truce currently in place.

Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods. When tariffs increase, it raises the cost of foreign products, which can reduce imports, distort prices, and trigger retaliatory measures.

Ongoing disagreements over rare earth exports, industrial subsidies, and access to strategic supply chains have kept tensions simmering. But the fact that both sides are back at the table suggests there may be space for a reset.

What Are They Discussing?

Talks this week are focused on three core issues:

1. Rare earth exports:
The U.S. is urging China to ease restrictions on exports of rare earth elements - materials critical to industries such as defence, clean energy, and semiconductors. Chinese curbs earlier this year disrupted global supply and sent prices soaring.

Rare earths are a group of 17 metallic elements used in high-tech products and applications. Despite the name, they are relatively abundant but difficult and costly to extract.

2. Extending the tariff truce:
Both countries are operating under a 90-day suspension of new tariffs, due to expire later this month. The U.S. wants to extend it, while China is demanding more clarity on American industrial subsidies and technology controls.

A truce in this context refers to a temporary halt in tariff increases, often used to de-escalate trade conflicts while negotiations continue.

3. Market access and reciprocity:
Washington is pushing for improved access for U.S. firms in China’s domestic market, particularly in sectors such as finance and advanced manufacturing. Beijing, in turn, is asking the U.S. to lift export controls on strategic technologies.

Market access refers to the ability of a country’s firms to sell goods or services in another country without facing excessive barriers. Reciprocity means ensuring mutual, balanced treatment in trade rules between partners.

Why Now?

The timing of the talks reflects shifting pressures on both sides:

• Slowing U.S. growth and elevated interest rates have increased pressure on the Trump administration to deliver a visible economic win ahead of the election cycle.
  

• China’s post-COVID recovery has lost momentum, weighed down by weak consumer demand and a still-fragile property sector — raising the need for stable external demand and capital inflows.
  

• Meanwhile, global financial markets are jittery. The lack of clarity on trade has contributed to volatility in bond yields, exchange rates, and commodity prices.
  

How Do These Talks Compare?

Unlike the confrontational tone of the 2018–2019 trade war, this round has taken on a more procedural, technical feel. Early reports indicate a constructive atmosphere, though no breakthroughs have been announced.

Still, both sides appear entrenched on key issues like export controls and supply chain independence. Without compromise, the risk remains that the truce could lapse, reigniting broader economic tensions.

What’s at Stake?

The outcome of these negotiations could ripple far beyond bilateral relations:

• Supply chain resilience: Progress on rare earths and critical inputs could help stabilise global manufacturing, especially in tech and green energy sectors.
  

• Inflation pressure: Easing trade restrictions may lower input costs and help contain inflation across developed markets.
  

• Market confidence: Even modest diplomatic progress could reduce volatility and restore investor confidence in global trade continuity.
  

Supply chains refer to the full network involved in producing and delivering goods. Disruptions — whether from tariffs or export bans — can increase costs and lead to shortages.

Final Thought

The resumption of serious U.S.–China trade diplomacy is a welcome shift in a turbulent macro environment. Whether this round ends with a breakthrough or simply a pause in hostilities, one thing is clear: the world economy still hinges on this relationship. And markets are watching every step.

2. UK Pensioners to Receive Winter Fuel Allowance Again - But With a Catch

The UK government has confirmed it will reintroduce the Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners earning up to £35,000, marking a significant policy reversal and a key moment in the broader cost-of-living response. The change, part of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ updated Budget, will see £1.25 billion redirected to support around 9 million pensioners ahead of the 2025–26 winter.

The Winter Fuel Payment is a tax-free annual benefit designed to help older people cover heating costs during the colder months. For many, especially those on fixed incomes, it plays a critical role in keeping energy bills manageable through winter.

A Political U-Turn, and Why It Happened

This decision also marks an apparent U-turn in Labour’s early fiscal strategy, which aimed to phase out universal benefits in favour of more targeted support. That shift was part of a broader effort to demonstrate fiscal prudence and rebuild trust with markets.

However, the reversal appears to be politically motivated. Labour’s disappointing performance in the recent local elections, particularly among older and rural voters, has raised concerns within the party about losing ground among traditionally stable voting blocs. Reinstating the Winter Fuel Payment is seen as a corrective and a signal that the government is listening.

Who Qualifies — and Who Doesn’t?

Under the revised scheme:

• Pensioners with incomes up to £35,000 will receive the full winter payment (typically £200–£300 depending on age and circumstances).
  

• Those earning £35,000 to £60,000 will see partial clawbacks through their tax code.
  

• Pensioners earning over £60,000 will not be eligible.
  

A clawback is a mechanism where government support is recovered through the tax system from individuals earning above a certain threshold, effectively converting a universal benefit into a targeted one.

How Does It Fit Into the Budget?

The announcement forms part of Reeves’ broader push to restore credibility to the UK’s fiscal position while still delivering targeted cost-of-living support. It follows a series of selective spending increases in areas like the NHS and defence, alongside tighter controls on other departments.

Fiscal policy refers to the government's use of spending and taxation to influence the economy. When budgets are tight, choices must be made between supporting vulnerable groups and maintaining fiscal discipline, especially in a high-interest-rate environment.

What’s the Economic Logic?

The government is betting that targeted transfers to lower-income households will be more efficient at stimulating demand without adding fuel to inflation.

Targeted transfers refer to payments explicitly aimed at those most likely to spend them - in this case, pensioners with limited disposable income. This approach is often considered more effective than broad-based tax cuts in boosting short-term economic activity.

At the same time, the clawback structure allows the Treasury to preserve progressive tax principles by ensuring those with higher incomes contribute more, even within the pensioner population.

Final Thought

In a cost-of-living crisis that continues to hit older households especially hard, the return of the Winter Fuel Payment — even in reduced form — will be welcomed by many. But the government’s decision also reflects a broader political recalibration: a signal that Labour is not only responding to economic conditions, but to voter sentiment as well.

As winter looms and energy prices remain elevated, this is likely not the last time the government will need to fine-tune how it supports the UK’s ageing population.

3. Transatlantic Rate Gap Widens as ECB Cuts and Trump Calls for Action

The interest rate gap between the U.S. and the Eurozone has reached its widest point since before the pandemic. Federal Reserve. On Thursday, the ECB cut its main policy rate to 2.0%, down from 2.5%, marking the first time in nearly five years that borrowing costs in Europe have moved below those in the U.S. This comes amid escalating pressure in the US with increased bond yields mounting on US debt pressure, uncertainty surrounding foreign policy and inflationary pressures.

At the same time, former U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified calls for the Federal Reserve to make a dramatic rate cut of its own, urging a full percentage point reduction. Trump has publicly attacked Fed Chair Jay Powell on social media, accusing him of being “too late” to act, amid signs that the U.S. labour market is cooling ahead of the November election. 

Interest rates are the main tool central banks use to influence the economy. Lowering rates makes borrowing cheaper, encouraging spending and investment. Raising rates helps cool down inflation by making credit more expensive.

This divergence in monetary policy is unusual and has important implications for currencies, trade, and financial markets on both sides of the Atlantic.

What’s Behind the Growing Rate Gap?

The rate gap now stands at 225 basis points, with the ECB at 2.0% and the Fed holding steady at 4.25–4.50%. That’s the largest difference since September 2019.

A basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. So 225 basis points equals 2.25%.

While inflation in the Eurozone has slowed faster than expected, allowing the ECB to cut, the Fed remains cautious. U.S. inflation, particularly core measures that exclude food and energy, remains stubbornly above 2%, and some Fed officials warn that tariffs and wage growth could reignite price pressures.

Meanwhile, the ECB is forecasting inflation to fall to just 1.6% in 2026, below its 2% target, justifying its rate cut and possibly more to come.

Trump’s Demand for “Rocket Fuel”

Trump’s calls for looser monetary policy are intensifying. In a post on his social platform, he urged the Fed to cut rates by 100 basis points, saying it would provide “rocket fuel” to the economy and accusing Powell of being asleep at the wheel.

This comes just after a mixed U.S. jobs report, which showed 139,000 jobs were added in May, better than expected, but still a sign of deceleration from earlier months.

Presidents typically do not directly influence Fed policy, as the central bank is intended to be independent. This independence is crucial for maintaining trust in U.S. financial policy.

When a political figure like Trump attempts to pressure the Fed into cutting interest rates for short-term political gain (e.g., before an election), it suggests that economic decisions may be influenced by political motives. That worries investors for two reasons:

1. Unpredictability: If investors think the Fed might bow to political pressure, they can’t rely on consistent, data-driven policy. This creates uncertainty, which makes markets more volatile.

2. Inflation Risk: If the Fed cuts rates too aggressively under pressure, it might overstimulate the economy and drive up inflation — eroding the value of investments.

As a result, investor confidence in the U.S. economy and its leadership can weaken, leading to a sell-off in financial markets, higher borrowing costs, and a weaker dollar. But politically, Trump is eager to boost economic momentum ahead of the November election, and rate cuts could help lower mortgage costs and stimulate credit.

Why Isn’t the Dollar Stronger?

Despite higher interest rates in the U.S., the dollar has recently weakened against the euro and other major currencies. Normally, a higher rate attracts investors and strengthens a currency, but not this time.

Markets are increasingly uneasy about the prospect of renewed Trump-era trade tariffs, which would increase import costs and potentially re-fuel inflation. At the same time, concerns about the long-term path of U.S. debt and deficits are weighing on investor confidence.

The euro, in contrast, has gained roughly 13% against the dollar since January, despite the ECB’s latest cut.

Currency values are driven by a mix of interest rates, economic strength, and investor confidence. In uncertain times, politics can matter just as much as policy.

What Are Central Banks Watching?

The ECB’s decision was guided by falling inflation and sluggish growth across the Eurozone. Policymakers believe they can ease without reigniting price pressures.

In the U.S., however, the Fed is more cautious. Core inflation remains above 2.5%, and some analysts warn that Trump’s proposed tariffs—particularly on Chinese goods—could raise costs for consumers, limiting the Fed’s ability to cut.

A tariff is a tax on imports. When tariffs rise, foreign goods become more expensive, which can boost inflation and strain supply chains.

The Fed is also watching wages. Rising labour costs can push prices higher, particularly in services like healthcare, hospitality, and logistics.

What Comes Next?

The ECB has signalled more cuts may be possible this year, especially if inflation stays low. If the Fed stays on hold or delays cuts until 2026 the rate gap could grow to 275 or even 300 basis points.

That would be the widest transatlantic spread since the mid-2000s.

Such a divergence could:

• Shift global capital flows, making European assets more attractive to yield-hunters.

• Put pressure on the U.S. dollar, especially if investors see political risk rising.

• Complicated global financial conditions, particularly in emerging markets that borrow in dollars but export to Europe.

Why It Matters

The widening interest rate gap between the U.S. and the Eurozone is more than just a monetary policy story. It reflects diverging inflation paths, political priorities, and market perceptions.

In Europe, the focus is on supporting fragile growth and meeting strict inflation targets. In the U.S., the debate is being shaped as much by politics as by price data.

The outcome could affect everything from mortgage rates and investment decisions to global trade patterns and exchange rates.

Final Thought

We’re watching a policy divide that could reshape global finance. The ECB is cutting to fight disinflation; the Fed is holding to avoid reigniting it. And Trump is doing what Trump does best, putting pressure on the system just when it’s least comfortable. Whether this ends in renewed coordination or deeper divergence may be one of the most essential macro stories of 2025.

4. NHS and Defence Prioritised in UK Spending Review, But Cuts Loom Elsewhere

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver her first full Spending Review this Wednesday, laying out the UK’s public finance strategy for the next three years. The key takeaway? Big wins for the NHS and defence, but tightening belts for almost everything else.

This review outlines Resource Departmental Expenditure Limits (RDEL), essentially the day-to-day spending budgets for each government department. With Reeves committing to fiscal credibility and avoiding major tax hikes, the funding envelope is tight, and the trade-offs are starting to show.

Where the Money Is Going

1. NHS Funding:
The National Health Service will see a 2.8% real-terms increase in day-to-day funding per year between 2026 and 2029. That adds up to £30 billion in cash terms. It’s a sizeable boost, though still below the NHS’s long-run average growth of around 3.6%.

(Real-terms growth means spending increases after adjusting for inflation. It reflects the actual increase in purchasing power.)

2. Defence:
Defence spending is set to rise above inflation, with a clear goal: to reach 2.5% of GDP by 2027. That aligns with NATO commitments and reflects increased geopolitical risk.

(GDP, or Gross Domestic Product, is the total value of goods and services produced in a country. Expressing spending as a percentage of GDP helps compare across time and countries.)

3. Schools:
Core school budgets for ages 5–16 will grow by an additional £4.5 billion annually by 2028–29, around a 7% increase from current levels. It’s a continuation of current protections, not a transformation.

4. Research & Development:
R&D receives £86 billion over four years, rising from £20.4bn to £22.5bn annually by 2030. But in real terms, this is effectively flat, meaning little change once inflation is factored in.

5. Infrastructure Investment:
The government will borrow to fund £113 billion in capital investment. Much of this reuses funds previously earmarked for scrapped HS2 plans and other delayed projects.

(Capital spending refers to long-term investments in infrastructure and assets, like roads, schools, and hospitals, rather than operational costs.)

What’s Getting Cut?

1. Local Councils and Courts:
Departments like local government, justice, and transport face real-terms cuts of ~0.3% per year. These services have already endured years of austerity and may struggle to absorb further reductions.

2. Policing and the Home Office:
Despite rising pressure, there’s no significant boost here. Any increases will have to come from internal reallocations, like trimming asylum accommodation budgets, which currently exceed £2.2 billion.

3. Public Transport and Planning:
Local and regional transport schemes will likely take a hit as capital is redirected toward national projects.

Why These Choices?

Political calculus:
Labour is doubling down on core public services, health, defence, and schools, all of which are highly visible and politically resonant. These areas poll well, particularly among swing voters.

Fiscal rules:
Reeves is committed to tight fiscal management. She restored a £9.9bn fiscal buffer this spring and remains cautious about breaching self-imposed rules.

(A fiscal buffer is a financial cushion that helps protect against future economic shocks, like slower growth or higher borrowing costs.)

Trade-offs:
The more that’s spent on protected departments, the less room there is for others. With RDEL growth capped at 1.2% per year in real terms, the math doesn’t leave much flexibility.

Is This Quiet Austerity?

Reeves insists not. But the similarities are uncomfortable for some economists and public sector leaders.

• Local services under pressure: Councils, courts, and social care providers face declining real budgets despite already-stretched resources.
  

• R&D optics vs. reality: Scientists warn that flat real-term R&D spending falls short of the government’s own innovation ambitions.
  

• Transport and planning erosion: With spending reshuffled rather than expanded, long-term infrastructure gaps may persist.

(Austerity refers to policies that aim to reduce government deficits through spending cuts, often affecting public services.)

Final Thought

The 2025 Spending Review draws a clear line: bolster the NHS, schools, and defence, and ask the rest to do more with less. Whether this approach is politically sustainable or economically sound will depend on Labour’s ability to find new revenue, unlock growth, or sell the public on prioritisation. Either way, the age of constraint isn’t over, it’s just wearing a new face.

Closing Remarks

As always, economic headlines are never just numbers — they’re signals. Behind every budget revision, trade meeting, or rate decision is a broader story about how countries are adapting to a shifting global reality.

We’ll be watching closely as trade talks unfold, interest rate paths diverge, and domestic policies get quietly rewritten under political pressure. Whether you’re an investor, student, or just someone trying to stay informed, we hope this week’s edition helped make sense of it all.

If you enjoyed this edition, share it with a friend or colleague who might find it helpful — and if there’s a story you think we should cover next time, just hit reply and let us know.

Thanks for reading, and we’ll see you next week.

Best wishes,
Harry & Reika
 Co-Founders, Echonomics

📚 Catch up on previous editions here: