The Weekly Echo (04/03/25)

Welcome back to The Weekly Echo, we’re already into March, and the global economic landscape is moving fast. Right now, it’s impossible to write a newsletter without dedicating a major section to the US and Trump, as his second-term policies continue to send shockwaves through markets and international relations.

This week, we’re breaking down the latest on US tariffs and how they’re set to reshape global trade, as well as rising tensions between Washington and Kyiv following President Zelensky’s contentious White House visit. Plus, we take a closer look at UK trade deal developments and other key factors shaping the world economy.

Let’s dive in.

US Tariffs Begin to Take Effect: What This Means for Global Trade

The first wave of new US tariffs comes into force today, with 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico now in effect. This is the first step in a broader trade strategy under President Trump, with additional tariffs on the European Union set to take effect in one month.

Breaking Down Tariffs

A tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods (goods manufactured abroad), making them more expensive for domestic (home) buyers. The goal is to:

1. Encourage domestic production – By making imports more expensive, tariffs protect local businesses from foreign competition.

2. Reduce trade deficits – The US imports more than it exports, meaning it spends more on foreign goods than it earns from selling abroad. Tariffs aim to balance this gap by discouraging imports.

3. Generate government revenue – Tariffs bring in money for the government, though they also raise costs for businesses and consumers.

4. Apply political pressure - governments may impose tariffs to pressure foreign countries to comply with their demands.

The Timeline of Tariffs

• March 4, 2025 – 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports begin, primarily targeting automobiles, steel, and agricultural products.

• April 4, 2025 – A 25% tariff on EU imports will take effect, disrupting trade in automotive, luxury goods, and machinery exports from Europe to the US.

The tariffs on Canada and Mexico were originally threatened as leverage to pressure both governments into addressing the smuggling of fentanyl into the U.S. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid made from various chemicals, has become the leading cause of opioid-related deaths in the U.S., with 74,000 fatalities in 2023. Since September, U.S. Authorities have seized 2,040 kg of fentanyl, with 98% coming from the Mexican border and less than 1% from the northern Canadian border. However, Canada’s role may be expanding, as its financial intelligence agency has reported increased involvement of criminal groups in fentanyl production. Despite the tariffs’ initial purpose, Trump has now stated that there ‘is no room left for a deal’. Tariffs often lead to retaliation, with Canada, Mexico, and the EU considering countermeasures, potentially escalating into a trade war.

How Tariffs Impact the Economy

• Higher prices for consumers – Since tariffs increase import prices, US businesses may pass these costs onto consumers, leading to higher inflation.

• Supply chain disruptions – Many industries rely on global supply chains. If tariffs make certain goods too expensive, companies may move production or source materials elsewhere, causing economic uncertainty.

• Reduced trade and potential job losses – Export-driven industries may suffer if other countries impose retaliatory tariffs, leading to potential job losses in affected sectors.

What This Means for the UK

Amid rising tensions between the US and the EU, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recent visit to Washington has sparked optimism about a potential free trade agreement (FTA) between the UK and the US.

• A UK-US trade deal could offer significant advantages, positioning Britain more favourably than the EU in securing better market access to the US.

• Industries such as finance, pharmaceuticals, and technology could see reduced trade barriers, making the UK a more attractive trading partner.

• The UK may benefit from supply chain shifts, as companies seek to relocate production from the EU to avoid tariffs.

Global Reactions and Market Impacts

• Stock markets have shown volatility, as businesses that rely on cross-border trade adjust their forecasts and supply chains.

• Canada and Mexico are weighing retaliatory tariffs, which could impact US exporters in sectors such as energy and agriculture.

• The EU has hinted at a strong response, raising concerns about a potential full-scale trade war if negotiations fail to de-escalate tensions.

What’s Next?

With global trade dynamics shifting, all eyes are on how these tariffs impact inflation, supply chains, and diplomatic relations. If retaliatory measures escalate, businesses could face higher costs and reduced competitiveness in international markets.

For now, the UK is positioned to take advantage of the situation, but the success of a potential US-UK trade deal will depend on ongoing negotiations and the geopolitical landscape in the coming months.

Trump vs. Zelensky: The White House Clash That Shook U.S.-Ukraine Relations

The recent high-profile confrontation between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has raised major concerns about the future of U.S. support for Ukraine. What was meant to be a diplomatic discussion on military aid and economic agreements turned into a heated exchange, leaving Ukraine’s wartime future uncertain and global leaders scrambling to assess the fallout.

The Confrontation: A Meeting That Went Off the Rails

On February 28, 2025, President Zelensky arrived at the White House for a scheduled diplomatic meeting with President Trump. The goal was to finalise discussions on a minerals-rights agreement that would see Ukraine offer the U.S. a significant stake in its natural resources in exchange for continued military support. However, the meeting quickly escalated into a public showdown, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of a signing ceremony and a joint press conference.

Key Moments That Defined the Conflict

• Zelensky’s Appearance – Upon arriving at the White House, Zelensky wore his signature military-style sweater and cargo pants, an outfit he has worn consistently since Russia’s 2022 invasion. While previously accepted as a symbol of wartime resilience, it reportedly frustrated Trump, who viewed it as a deliberate PR move to pressure the U.S. into continued support.

• Trump’s Accusation of Ingratitude – During their private discussion, Trump accused Zelensky of failing to show enough appreciation for past U.S. support, claiming that billions in aid had been handed over with little acknowledgement. Trump reportedly demanded greater concessions in return for future military assistance.

• The Heated Exchange – According to sources present in the room, Zelensky firmly rejected any suggestion that Ukraine was not grateful, pointing out that his country was fighting on the front lines for Western democracy. Trump then doubled down, arguing that the U.S. had no obligation to "fund Ukraine forever" and that Europe needed to step up more.

• The Walkout – As tensions escalated, the meeting ended abruptly, with both leaders walking away from the negotiation table. The scheduled joint press conference was cancelled, leaving White House aides scrambling to contain the situation.

Immediate Consequences: What It Means Right Now

• U.S. Military Aid in Question – Following the meeting, Trump ordered an immediate review of all ongoing U.S. weapons deliveries to Ukraine, raising fears that future military support could be significantly reduced or even suspended.

• Global Leaders Take Sides – In response to the breakdown in talks, European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, expressed renewed support for Ukraine and discussed forming a "coalition of the willing" to sustain military aid without U.S. involvement.

• Russia Seizes the Opportunity – Russian state media quickly capitalised on the fallout, using the incident to portray Ukraine as isolated and frame Zelensky as a leader losing Western backing.

What This Could Mean Going Forward

1. A Shift in U.S. Foreign Policy

   • Trump’s "America First" stance has always prioritized reducing U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts. If he follows through on scaling back aid, it could reshape NATO’s approach to the war and leave Europe scrambling to fill the gap.

2. A More Isolated Ukraine?

   • If the U.S. pulls back, Ukraine may have to rely more heavily on European support or seek new alliances elsewhere, possibly deepening economic and military ties with non-Western nations.

3. An Advantage for Russia?

   • Any fracture in Western unity benefits Russia, which has been waiting for signs of U.S. fatigue in its commitment to Ukraine. A decrease in military aid could tilt the balance of the war in Moscow’s favour.

Final Thoughts

This highly public fallout between Trump and Zelensky marks a turning point in U.S.-Ukraine relations. With military aid now uncertain, global allies reassessing their commitments, and Russia watching closely, the world waits to see how Ukraine will navigate this diplomatic crisis, and whether Trump’s stance will evolve as his presidency unfolds.

UK Trade Developments: Navigating New Opportunities Amid Global Challenges

The United Kingdom is actively reshaping its trade landscape through strategic negotiations and agreements to bolster economic growth and strengthen international partnerships.​

Engagement with the United States

As previously discussed, the UK is optimistic about securing a trade agreement with the United States. While talks are ongoing, recent discussions between Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Donald Trump have focused on a potential economic deal centred on advanced technology sectors. This approach reflects a shift from pursuing a comprehensive free trade agreement to targeting specific industries for collaboration. However, challenges remain, particularly concerning regulatory alignments and market access, which require careful negotiation to balance mutual interests. 

Rekindling Trade Negotiations with India

The UK government has announced the resumption of negotiations with India to establish a free trade agreement. This initiative builds upon previous efforts to strengthen economic ties and expand trade relationships with Southeast Asian nations. A successful agreement with India could open new markets for UK businesses and enhance bilateral investment opportunities. ​

Accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

The UK's accession to the CPTPP marks a significant milestone in its post-Brexit trade strategy. The agreement, which came into force for the UK on December 15, 2024, offers enhanced market access to a bloc with a combined GDP of approximately £9 trillion. Membership in the CPTPP is expected to provide UK businesses with new opportunities in diverse markets, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, and strengthen the UK's position in global trade networks. ​

Balancing Relationships with the European Union

The UK faces strategic decisions in balancing its trade relationships with the EU and other global partners. Brussels has indicated that the UK may need to choose between aligning with EU regulations to facilitate smoother trade or pursuing independent agreements, such as a free trade deal with the US, which could entail different regulatory standards. This decision carries significant implications for sectors like manufacturing and agriculture, where regulatory divergence could impact market access and competitiveness. ​

Domestic Business Sentiment and Export Challenges

Medium-sized British firms, particularly manufacturers with annual turnovers between £10 million and £300 million, have expressed increasing concern over export barriers, identifying them as the primary threat to growth in the next six months. Nearly half of these companies view export and trade barriers as major challenges, while over a third cite exporting goods and services as the main obstacle to business expansion. Additionally, rising employment costs due to increased national insurance contributions and a higher national living wage are seen as significant challenges. Many companies are calling for government support, including access to export finance and new trade agreements, to mitigate these issues. 

Conclusion

The UK's proactive approach to redefining its trade relationships reflects a commitment to embracing new economic opportunities while addressing domestic challenges. By engaging in strategic negotiations and aligning with global trade networks, the UK aims to enhance its economic resilience and secure a prosperous future in the evolving international trade landscape.

Transatlantic Tensions: Europe's Security at a Crossroads Amid Shifting U.S. Policies

Former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has raised alarms about the deteriorating transatlantic relationship, suggesting that Europe may need to bolster its defence capabilities independently. This perspective emerges amidst escalating tensions, including U.S. tariffs on European goods, controversial geopolitical proposals, and strained negotiations with Ukraine.​

Eroding Transatlantic Ties

Rasmussen warns that Europe's longstanding reliance on U.S. security support is increasingly precarious. He advocates for a substantial increase in European defence spending, proposing an immediate rise to 3% of GDP, escalating to 4% by 2028. This recommendation, coupled with the fact Russia outspent the whole of the European bloc on defence last year, underscores the urgency for Europe to assume greater responsibility for its security in light of shifting U.S. commitments.

Contentious U.S. Policies

Several recent U.S. actions have strained relations with European allies:​

• Trade Tariffs: The U.S. has imposed significant tariffs on European imports, exacerbating economic tensions and prompting discussions on potential retaliatory measures. ​

• Geopolitical Proposals: President Trump's suggestions, such as the annexation of Greenland and integrating Canada as a U.S. state, have unsettled European leaders, raising concerns about U.S. intentions and respect for international norms.

• Ukraine Minerals Deal: The U.S. has pressured Ukraine to allocate 50% of its revenue from state-owned natural resources, including critical minerals, oil, and gas, into a joint reconstruction investment fund. This proposal has been met with apprehension due to the lack of explicit security guarantees for Ukraine. 

Implications for European Security

The potential weakening of U.S.-Europe ties necessitates a reevaluation of Europe's defence strategies:​

• Increased Defense Spending: To mitigate reliance on U.S. military support, Europe may need to significantly boost defence budgets, potentially impacting social welfare programs and fiscal policies. 

• Strategic Autonomy: Developing independent defence capabilities could empower Europe to address regional security challenges more effectively, though it requires substantial investment and coordination among EU member states.​

• Diplomatic Recalibration: Europe might seek to strengthen alliances within the continent and diversify international partnerships to compensate for the shifting U.S. stance.​

Conclusion

The evolving dynamics of the transatlantic relationship, influenced by recent U.S. policies and Europe's defence considerations, present both challenges and opportunities. Europe's proactive adaptation to these changes will be crucial in maintaining regional stability and asserting its role on the global stage.

That wraps up this week’s top stories. As always, we’d love to hear your thoughts! Got feedback or a story you’d like us to cover? Hit reply and let us know.

If you found this edition valuable, share it with a friend or colleague who might enjoy it! 

Thanks for reading, and as always we will see you next week!

Best wishes,
Harry & Reika
Co-Founders, Echonomics

📢 Did you miss any of our previous editions? Catch up on all our past stories over on our website: